Blocked for Telling the Truth: When Speaking Up Against Joel Runnels, PhD, Becomes Grounds for Erasure
There is a disturbing pattern in global systems of power: women from the Global South who speak truth to power are silenced, dismissed, or erased. Especially when the truth involves men with Western credentials, impressive titles, and polished public images.
This is exactly what happened — again — when I was blocked for the second time by the Minnesota Council on Disability (MCD) after raising serious, personal, and repeated concerns about Joel Benjamin Runnels, PhD — a former U.S. diplomat, former USAID officer, and now their Legislative Affairs Director.
Let me be clear: this is not a smear campaign.
This is a lived reality.
This is a demand for transparency, accountability, and ethical consistency.
Who Is Joel Runnels?
To the public, Joel Runnels is a respected figure. A man with multiple degrees, language fluency, and international experience. Someone who worked in diplomatic posts across Ghana, Kenya, Jamaica, and Uzbekistan.
To institutions, he represents progress and professionalism.
But to several women — myself included — he represents a dangerous contradiction:
A man who preaches justice, yet practices emotional harm in private.
A man who advocates for vulnerable children abroad, but refuses to acknowledge or emotionally support his own.
He promised love, claimed single and never marry, built emotional intimacy — only to vanish, gaslight, and emotionally abandon the women who trusted him.
In Jamaica, he allegedly fathered twochilds and left the country with no responsibility.
In multiple countries, he repeated the same cycle: charm, intimacy, manipulation, disappearance.
This isn’t just infidelity.
This is patterned psychological abuse, protected by diplomatic immunity and institutional silence.
Why I Was Blocked
When I first raised my voice, I shared the truth — not with hostility, but with clarity.
I commented on public posts by MCD, calling attention to the disconnect between the role Joel holds and the harm he has caused. Instead of engaging in dialogue, they deleted my comments. I tried again. I was blocked.
This week, I tried once more. I posted again. I shared evidence, accountability, and context.
And I was blocked again.
Let’s ask:
What does it say about a public institution — one advocating for justice and equity — that they cannot tolerate survivors’ voices?
Why does protecting their staff matter more than investigating the harm their staff has caused?
If we were white women from Western countries, would our stories be taken more seriously?
Do we not matter because we are women from the so-called “developing world”?
The Bigger Problem
When institutions silence survivors, they’re not being neutral — they’re being complicit.
Blocking a woman who speaks up is not “managing discourse.” It’s protecting a predator.
Deleting uncomfortable truths is not “professionalism.” It’s gaslighting at scale.
The message being sent is clear:
“We’d rather protect a man with a PhD and a diplomatic past than acknowledge the women he harmed.”
And to that I say: No. Not anymore.
We Will Keep Speaking
To the Minnesota Council on Disability and every institution like it:
Silencing one voice won’t stop the truth.
Erasing one comment won’t erase a pattern.
Blocking one woman will not stop others from speaking.
Because I speak not only for myself — but for the dozens of women left confused, broken, and discarded by men who wear suits and speak of peace.
We are not disposable.
We are not emotional liabilities.
We are truth-tellers.
Closing Words
You blocked me because I made you uncomfortable.
Because I held a mirror to the hypocrisy your organization refuses to face.
Because a man with power harmed someone without it — and you chose to protect him instead of investigate him.
Just remember:
I will keep voicing this story. I will not stop.
Because justice doesn’t start with institutions. It starts with people brave enough to say:
“This happened to me. And it’s not okay.”
And no block button can undo that.
Comments
Post a Comment